The hydroforming press has been the preferred alternative to traditional metal stamping for many years. You can look for the best hydroforming press via https://www.macrodynepress.com/hydraulic-presses/hydroforming-presses/.
Image Source: Google
Metal stamping was the preferred method of metal forming for decades. However, hydroforming presses offer many financial and other benefits that cannot be duplicated by metal stamping.
It is important to understand the differences between hydroforming and other forms of hydroforming.
Operational costs are the first benefit. Hydroforming is cost-effective in the first place: the tooling process.
A hydroforming press is a one-time investment that allows you to start the process with minimal tooling. Sheet stamping, on the other hand, is expensive to set up and can be repeated many times. This greatly increases the operational cost base.
Hydroforming also has a lower cost per unit of operation. This is because it reduces processing costs. Sheet stamping is expensive for small runs. This will decrease with increasing production quantities.
A hydroforming press can reduce tooling, setup, and development costs. Hydroforming can reduce overall processing costs up to 80% according to some studies.
Material wastage is the last area in which hydroforming can be more economical.
The scrap generated by hydroforming is very low or negligible. Even with close nesting, conventional sheet stamping can produce a high amount of material waste. Sheet stamping can result in 50% to 70% more material waste than hydroforming.
Hydroforming presses offer many other benefits than financial. First, the quality of the finished product. Hydroforming produces high-quality products that are much more cost-effective than secondary finishing.
Also, parts have shown a significantly higher structural strength. This is due to sheet stamping sins, and/or stretch which can impact the desired tolerance.
This can also affect the overall appearance and feel of the product, making secondary finishing necessary.